Potensi Pelestarian Dan Pariwisata Rumah Pohon Suku Kombay Boven Digoel Papua

  • Yashinta Irma Pratami Hematang Jurusan Arsitektur, Universitas Musamus
  • Dina Limbong Pamuttu Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Universitas Musamus
Keywords: Kearifan Lokal; Arsitektur; Konservasi; Modernisasi

Abstract

The Treehouse is a work of Nusantara Architecture which is gaining in popularity in Papua, inhabited by two large Boven Digoel tribes namely the Korowai Tribe and also the Kombay Tribe. The Kombay Tree House is situated on a strong old tree with three layers of flooring, wooden walls and roofing material made of sago leaves. To assemble the house, a strong rattan rope is used. Behind that, Nusantara Architecture has a challenge that is accelerating development in the name of modernization. Behind modernization there are challenges for the preservation of the Tree House. For this reason, studies need to be carried out to explore the potential contained in the Treehouse so that the Treehouse should always be preserved. The purpose of this study is to analyze the categorization of the potential level of preservation of Treehouses using conservation criteria and explore the potential of tourism types of Treehouses. The results showed Treehouses have a category of high level of potential conservation. For tourism potential that can be further developed are educational tourism, nature tourism, and cultural tourism. This research is inductive exploratory research using descriptive-analytic survey method with observation and interviews also evaluative method.

References

[1] Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Boven Digoel, “STATISTIK DAERAH KABUPATEN BOVEN DIGOEL TAHUN 2017,” Oct. 2017.
[2] Tri Prasetyo Utomo, “Tipologi dan Pelestarian Bangunan Bersejarah,” J. Seni Rupa Surakarta, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 2005.
[3] P. R. Indonesia, UU No 11 Tahun 2010 Tentang Cagar Budaya. 2010, pp. 1–56.
[4] G. W. Pangarsa, E. Y. Titisari, A. M. Ridjal, and D. J. Ernawati, “Tipologi Nusantara Green Architecture,” vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1693–3702, 2012.
[5] M. I. Hidayatun, “Belajar Arsitektur Nusantara dari Gereja Puhsarang Kediri Tinjauan ke-Bineka Tunggal Ika-an,” Simp. Int. Jelajah Arsit. Nusant., p. B2.B1-1-B2.B1-16, 2003.
[6] E. Setyowati, Metodologi Riset Dan Statistik. UPT Universitas Diponegoro Press Semarang, 2013.
[7] Agustinha Risdyaningsih, “Pelestarian Gedung Pertemuan Kompleks Asrama Inggrisan Kota Banyuwangi,” eJournal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 115–128, 2014.
[8] Eriyanto, Analisis Isi: Pengantar Metodologi untuk Penelitian Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Prenada Media Group, 2013.
[9] R. Priyanto, D. Syarifudin, and S. Martina, “Perancangan Model Wisata Edukasi Di Objek Wisata Kampung Tulip,” J. ABDIMAS BSI J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 40–46, 2018.
[10] H. A. Devy, “Pengembangan Obyek Dan Daya Tarik Wisata Alam Sebagai Daerah Tujuan Wisata Di Kabupaten Karanganyar,” J. Sosiol. DILEMA, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 34–44, 2017.
[11] N. R. Kirom, Sudarmiatin, and I. W. J. A. Putra, “Faktor-Faktor Penentu Daya Tarik Wisata Kepuasan Wisatawan,” pp. 536–546, 2016.
Published
09-03-2020