Analisis Wilayah Potensi Ubi Kayu

  • Dayu Nur Angga Nur Angga
  • untari untari
  • Maria Maghdalena Diana Widiastuti
Keywords: analisis wilayah, singkong, Location Quotient (LQ), merauke

Abstract

Merauke Regency is a relatively large agricultural area that has not been widely used so that the potential for the growth and development of cassava plants. Besides cassava has many benefits both for daily needs to be used as a raw material for many processed products. This study aims to determine the potential of the base area and the characteristics of the spread of cassava commodities in Merauke Regency. The study was conducted in 13 districts (districts). This type of research is descriptive research. This research uses purposive sampling. Analysis of the data used is Location Quotient (LQ), localization coefficient and specialization analysis. Cassava commodity base districts with harvest area indicators are Sota, Ulilin, Animha, Jagebob, Kimaam, Okaba, Elikobel, Naukenjerai and Merauke Districts. Cassava commodity base districts with indicators of total production are Sota, Ulilin, Jagebob, Kimaam, Animha, Elikobel, Okaba and Naukenjerai Districts. The characteristics of the distribution of cassava commodity farming activities with a positive localization coefficient value is 0.5966 and there are six districts that have a positive localization coefficient each year, namely the Districts of Kimaam, Okaba, Naukenjerai, Jagebob, Sota and Elikobel. Districts that have positive specialization coefficient values ​​specialize one of their agricultural activities in cassava commodities with an average value of specialization coefficient of more than one, namely 1.3088 and an increase in the value of specialization coefficient each year.

Keywords: Area analysis; cassava; potential; Location Quotient (LQ)

References

Arikunto, S. 2010. ProsedurPenelitian. Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. (Edisi Revisi).PT. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.
BPS. 2014. Kabupaten Merauke Dalam Angka 2014. BPS Kabupaten Merauke.
BPS. 2015. Kabupaten Merauke Dalam Angka 2015. BPS Kabupaten Merauke.
BPS. 2016. Kabupaten Merauke Dalam Angka 2016. BPS Kabupaten Merauke.
BPS. 2017. Kabupaten Merauke Dalam Angka 2017. BPS Kabupaten Merauke.
BPS. 2018. Kabupaten Merauke Dalam Angka 2018. BPS Kabupaten Merauke.
Danarti, S. Najiyati. 1999. Palawija Budidaya dan Analisis Pascapanen. Penebar Swadaya. Bogor.
Faidah, Ainun. 2015. Analisis Wilayah Komoditas Ubi Kayu dan Kontribusinya Terhadap Sektor Pertanian di Kabupaten Pacitan. Universitas Jember. Jember.
Mei. Eko. Sri. 2010. Analisis Komoditi Unggulan Sektor Pertanian Kabupaten Sukoharjo Sebelum Dan Selama Otonomi Daerah. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan.
Pratama. 2016. Pengaruh Sektor Basis & Nonbasis Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Di Kabupaten Pasuruan tahun 2009-2013. Universitas Negeri Surabaya : Surabaya.
Raharjo, SHT., H. Hetharie., G.H. Augustyn., M. Pesireron. 2014. Keragaman Ubi Kayu dan Ubi Jalar di Seram Bagian Barat dan Peluang Pemanfaatannya Untuk Ketahanan dan Industri. Pensil Komunika. Yogyakarta.
Setiono, D. N. S, 2011. Ekonomi Pengembangan Wilayah (Teori dan Analisis). LPFE-UI. Jakarta.
Sitorus, Santun Risma Pandapotan, dkk. 2014. Identifikasi Komoditas Tanaman Basis Tanaman Pangan Dan Arahan Pengembangannya Di Provinsi Lampung. IPB : Bogor.
Saragih, Jef Rudianto. 2015. Perencanaan wilayah dan pengembangan ekonomi lokal berbasis pertanian. Penerbit Pustaka Belajar. Yogyakarta
Soepomo, P. 2010. Analisis Shift Share “Perkembangan Dan Penerapan”. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Indonesia.
Wargiono, J., Hasanudin, A dan Suryamto. 2006. Teknologi Produksi Ubi Kayu Mendukung Industri Bioethanol. Puslitbangtan. Bogor.
Warpani, P. 2001. Pariwisata Dalam Tata Ruang. ITB. Bandung.
Published
2019-10-30
How to Cite
Angga, D. N. A., untari, untari, & Widiastuti, M. (2019). Analisis Wilayah Potensi Ubi Kayu. Musamus Journal of Agribusiness, 2(1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.35724/mujagri.v2i01.2304

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>