Analysis Of Some Superior Varieties Of Rice Farming
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the differences in rice farming production of Inpari 32, Ir 64 and Cigelis varieties in the study area, to analyze the differences in rice farming acceptance of Inpari 32, Ir 64 and Cigelis varieties in the study area, to analyze the differences in income of Inpari 32 rice field rice farming, Ir 64 and Cigelis in the study area, analyzed whether the rice cultivation of Inpari 32, Ir 64 and Cigelis varieties was feasible from the ratio of revenue and cost (R / C) in the study area. This research was conducted in Tanah Miring District, Merauke Regency. The location selection was done purposively. The population was 4,770 farmers and the sampling was done by using purposive method, 5% of the population was taken, in order to obtain a sample of 128 farmers. The analysis technique used in this research is to use cost, revenue, income, and feasibility analysis. The results show that there are differences in production, acceptance and income of Inpari 32, Ir 64 and Cigelis rice fields with an average land area of ​​1.5 ha. With the R / C of the Inpari 32 variety of 3.05 BEP, the production was 995 kg and the BEP was 2.463 / kg. The R / C of the Ir 64 variety was 2.59 with a BEP of production of 1.055 kg and a BEP of 2,930 / kg and the R / C of the Cigelis variety of 2.50 with a production BEP of 1,036 kg and a BEP of 3,312 / kg.
References
BPTP Papua, 2009. Pengolahan Tanaman Terpadu dengan Display Varietas Unggul Baru. Laporan Tahunan Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian Papua.
BPTP Papua, 2011. Pengolahan Tanaman Terpadu dengan Display Varietas Unggul Baru. Laporan Tahunan Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian Papua.
Choiriyah, V. U., AR, M. D., & Hidayat, R. R. (2016). Analisis Break Even Point sebagai alat perencanaan penjualan pada tingkat laba yang diharapkan (Studi Kasus pada Perhutani Plywood Industri Kediri Tahun 2013-2014). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, Vol. 35, No. 1.
Damanik, J. A. (2014). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pendapatan Petani Padi di Kecamatan Masaran Kabupaten Sragen. EDAJ, Vol. 3, No. 1.
Gupito, R. W., Irham, & Waluyati, L. R. (2014). Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pendapatan Usahatani Sorgum di Kabupaten Gunung Kidul. Agro Ekonomi, Vol. 24. No. 1.
Kementerian Pertanian, 2013. Statistika Pertanian.
Ridha, A. (2017). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pendapatan Petani di Kecamatan Nurussalam Aceh Timur. Jurnal Samudra Ekonomika, Vol. 1, No. 2.
Rahmadona, Fariyanti, & Burhanuddin, 2015. Analisis Pendapatan Usahatani Bawang Merah Di Kabupaten Majalengka. AGRISE Volume XV No. 2 Bulan Mei 2015. ISSN: 1412-1425.
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung.
Surahman, Memen, dkk, 2015. Kebijakan Perbenihan Padi Masa Depan. Biro Perencanaan Kementerian Pertanian.
Yusri Indra Nasution, 2017. Analisis Usahatani Beberapa Varietas Unggul Padi Sawah di Kabupaten Labuhanbatu. Program Studi Magister Agribisnis. Program Pascasarjana Universitas Medan Area. Medan.
Untari, 2014. Analisis Usaha Tani Beberapa Varietas Padi dengan Menggunakan Revenue Cost Ratio (R/C Ratio). Agricola, Vol 4 (1), Maret 2014, 1-7 p-ISSN : 2088 – 1673, e-ISSN 2354-7731.