PERBANDINGAN MODEL KOMPARASI DALAM MENENTUKAN SEKTOR UNGGULAN KABUPATEN SABU RAIJUA

  • Rizka Jafar Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
  • Wayrohi Meilvidiri Universitas Musamus
Keywords: Leading Sector; Economic Development Planning

Abstract

The study identified the leading sectors in Sabu Raijua Regency using several competitive advantage models (LQ, DLQ, MRP, Tress Index, Shift Share, and Multiplier Effect). The results of the comparison of several potential sector models in Sabu Raijua Regency reveals that the leading sectors (LQ > 1) are the Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries Sectors; Processing Industry Sector; Construction Sector; Wholesale and Retail Trade Sector; Car and Motorcycle Repair; Accommodation and Food and Drink Provision Sector; and the Real Estate Sector. DLQ analysis and Carvalho Classification indicate that the sectors with a fast growth rate and high category are the Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries Sectors. Then six sectors have a multiplier impact (ME > 1), namely the Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries Sectors; Processing Industry Sector; Construction Sector; Wholesale and Retail Trade Sector; Car and Motorcycle Repair; Accommodation and Food and Drink Provision Sector; and the Real Estate Sector. Furthermore, the MRP analysis shows that the Manufacturing Sector; Wholesale and Retail Trade, Car and Motorcycle Repair Sector; Accommodation and Food and Drink Provision Sector; and Other Services Sector are the dominant growth sectors (Classification 1). In addition, the results of the analysis of the tress index demonstrate an increasing trend during the study period.

 

Keyword: Leading Sector; Economic Development Planning

References

[1] BPS Kabupaten Sabu Raijua, “PDRB ADHK Menurut Lapangan Usaha (Juta Rupiah), 2017-2019.” https://saburaijuakab.bps.go.id/indicator/52/32/1/pdrb-adhk-menurut-lapangan-usaha.html (accessed Oct. 14, 2021).
[2] BPS Kabupaten Sabu Raijua, “PDRB ADHK Menurut Lapangan Usaha (Juta Rupiah), 2016-2020,” 2021.
[3] K. K. Direktorat Jenderal Pembendaharaan, “Kajian Fiskal Regional Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur Tahun 2020,” 2020.
[4] W. Meilvidiri, U. A S, Asrudi, and W. O. Alzarliani, “Comparison of Competitive Model Advantage Tools in the Economic Potential of North Kolaka Regency,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 2019, doi: doi:10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012220.
[5] A. O. Krueger, “Government Failures in Development,” J. Econ. Perspect., vol. VOL. 4, NO, pp. 9–23, 1990, doi: 10.1257/jep.4.3.9.
[6] M. Diana, D. Susilowati, and S. Hadi, “Analisis Sektor Ekonomi Unggulan Di Provinsi Maluku Utara,” J. Ilmu Ekon., vol. 1, no. 4, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jie/article/view/6280/5645.
[7] B. Kharisma and F. Hadiyanto, “Analysis of Potential Sectors and Policy Priorities of Regional Economic Development in Maluku Province,” Etikonomi, vol. 18, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.15408/etk.v18i1.7440.
[8] R. Jafar and W. Meilvidiri, “Analisis Potensi Dan Kontribusi Sektor Pariwisata Dalam Meningkatkan Pendapatan Asli Daerah Kabupaten Pulau Taliabu– Maluku Utara,” J. Ilm. Ecosyst., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 782–791, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unibos.ac.id/eco/article/view/835/388.
[9] A. Setiawan and F. Fikriah, “Pengaruh Belanja Pemerintah Bidang Pendidikan, Kesehatan Dan Perlindungan Sosial Terhadap Indeks Pembangunan Manusia Di …,” J. Ilm. Mhs. Ekon. …, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 212–221, 2020.
[10] L. Arsyad, Ekonomi Pembangunan. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi YKPN, Yogyakarta, 2016.
[11] V. Jurkovičová, L., Marhitich, V., & Kubiniy, “Strategic Analysis of Regional Potential of Development,” 2020, [Online]. Available: http://www.derivat.sk/files/2020 financne trhy/FT_4_2020_Jurkovicova,Marhitich,Kubiniy.pdf.
[12] C. Meintjes, Guidelines to Regional Socio-economic Analysis, no. March. 2001.
Published
2022-10-31